top of page
Notes on why certain decisions are never truly finalized, what shifted once the entire system could be mapped, and what it means to institutionalize a function rather than simply provide an answer.
← Perspectives
Midsize banks may have inherited their judgment, and they decide with less margin for error
Mexico's 16 midsize banks operate with less scale than the large ones, and a coordination error among the areas that decide their balance sheet would weigh more heavily on their results [H]. We start from a premise that public figures do not prove: midsize banks have the committees that decide the balance sheet—assets and liabilities, pricing, risk— [H] (section 7). Over the past year, 12-month return on equity (ROE) fell at 13 of the 16 [D]; the average liquidity coverage ra
The Digital Transition got the data ready; the decision it was meant to improve would start with its formulation
Evidence markers: [V] verified · [D] derived · [E] estimate with an explicit assumption · [H] unproven hypothesis Evidence markers: [V] verified against the primary source · [D] derived, with the calculation shown or in the supporting evidence book · [E] estimate with stated assumptions · [H] unproven hypothesis. Citations of SF-3, DT-2026-001, DS-2026-004, PE-1, and the storage Perspective inherit the marker those pieces assigned; PE-1 and the storage Perspective are still i
Where the internal price stops, a bank's business areas can decide separately
Evidence markers: [V] verified · [D] derived · [E] estimate with an explicit assumption · [H] unproven hypothesis A universal bank makes many decisions, and a few of them compete for the same resources, consume the same constraints, and change the state on which the others are made. When each one is resolved within its own area and against its own target, the bank can end up with decisions that are locally correct and jointly inconsistent [H]. This Perspective proposes a map
bottom of page